Selection Coefficient Calculator
Calculate selection coefficients, relative fitness, and allele frequency changes. Predict evolutionary outcomes and measure the strength of natural selection in populations
Usually set to 1.0 as the reference
Can be higher than 1.0 for overdominance
Determines heterozygote effect
Frequency of the selected allele (0 to 1)
Positive = beneficial, negative = deleterious
0 = complete dominance, 0.5 = additive, 1 = recessive
Selection Coefficient (s)
Selection Type
Relative Fitness Values
Fitness Comparison
Interpretation
Understanding Selection Coefficients
The selection coefficient (s) measures the strength of natural selection acting on a trait. It quantifies the relative disadvantage (or advantage) of one genotype compared to another. A selection coefficient of 0 means no selection (neutral evolution), while larger absolute values indicate stronger selection.
Key Concepts
- Absolute Fitness (W): The average number of offspring produced by a genotype
- Relative Fitness (w): Fitness scaled so the fittest genotype has w = 1.0
- Selection Coefficient (s): s = 1 - w, where w is relative fitness
- Dominance Coefficient (h): Determines the fitness of heterozygotes
- • h = 0: Complete dominance (Aa has same fitness as AA)
- • h = 0.5: Additive/no dominance (Aa intermediate)
- • h = 1: Complete recessiveness (Aa has same fitness as aa)
Fitness Relationships
| Genotype | Absolute Fitness | Relative Fitness |
|---|---|---|
| AA | WAA | 1 |
| Aa | WAa | 1 - hs |
| aa | Waa | 1 - s |
Types of Natural Selection
Directional Selection
- • Favors one extreme phenotype
- • Increases frequency of beneficial allele
- • Example: Antibiotic resistance
- • s > 0 for favored allele
Balancing Selection
- • Maintains genetic variation
- • Heterozygote advantage (overdominance)
- • Example: Sickle cell anemia in malaria regions
- • WAa > WAA and Waa
Purifying Selection
- • Removes deleterious mutations
- • Most common type of selection
- • Maintains functional genes
- • s < 0 for deleterious allele
Disruptive Selection
- • Favors both extremes
- • Selects against intermediate phenotypes
- • Can lead to speciation
- • Rare in nature
Interpreting Selection Strength
Weak Selection (|s| < 0.01)
Fitness difference less than 1%. Nearly neutral evolution. Changes occur slowly over many generations. Genetic drift may be more important than selection. Example: Synonymous mutations in genes.
Moderate Selection (0.01 < |s| < 0.1)
Fitness difference 1-10%. Selection is effective in large populations. Allele frequencies change over dozens to hundreds of generations. Example: Many polygenic traits, lactose tolerance.
Strong Selection (0.1 < |s| < 0.5)
Fitness difference 10-50%. Rapid evolutionary change. Beneficial alleles spread quickly; deleterious alleles removed efficiently. Example: Insecticide resistance, major disease resistance alleles.
Very Strong Selection (|s| > 0.5)
Fitness difference greater than 50%. Extremely rapid change. Lethal or semi-lethal mutations. Example: Homozygous lethal alleles (s = 1), severe genetic diseases.
Real-World Examples
Peppered Moths (Biston betularia)
During the Industrial Revolution, dark-colored moths had a selective advantage in polluted areas due to better camouflage on soot-darkened trees.
Selection coefficient: s ≈ 0.3-0.5 for light moths in polluted areas
Sickle Cell Anemia
Heterozygotes (HbA/HbS) have resistance to malaria while suffering minimal effects from sickle cell trait, demonstrating heterozygote advantage.
Selection coefficients: sAA ≈ 0.1 (malaria deaths), saa ≈ 0.8 (severe anemia), wAa ≈ 1.0 (protected)
Antibiotic Resistance
Bacteria with resistance mutations have dramatically higher fitness in the presence of antibiotics, leading to rapid evolution of resistance.
Selection coefficient: s ≈ 0.9-1.0 for susceptible bacteria (effectively lethal in presence of antibiotic)
CCR5-Δ32 and HIV Resistance
A 32-base-pair deletion in the CCR5 gene provides resistance to HIV infection. Homozygotes are nearly immune; heterozygotes show delayed progression.
Selection coefficient: In HIV-endemic populations, s ≈ -0.2 for wild-type allele (beneficial for deletion)
References
Selection coefficient calculations are based on established population genetics theory:
Related Calculators
Note: This calculator uses standard population genetics models. Real populations may experience multiple selective pressures, frequency-dependent selection, environmental variation, and gene interactions that affect actual fitness values. Selection coefficients can vary across environments, life stages, and genetic backgrounds.
Recommended Calculator
Casio FX-991ES Plus
The professional-grade scientific calculator with 417 functions, natural display, and solar power. Perfect for students and professionals.
View on Amazon